Modal Research Exchange

you are

TailRL vs Dr. GRPO under lag 0 and lag 8 on SEC search, a pilot that fits 32 GPU-hours

Failed no result partial results agentcore Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B RL 32.0 GPU-h budget started 12h ago 4h 02m 1 turn
Redo
Pick where the agent works.

The agentcore session ended (error) without a final report. Partial results: the metrics are from agentcore's last interim update (21:23 UTC); arms reported complete: tailrl_L8.

Full summary

The agentcore session ended (error) without a final report. Partial results: the metrics are from agentcore's last interim update (21:23 UTC); arms reported complete: tailrl_L8. Last status: tailrl_L8 finished 24 updates (eval F4 0.261 vs base 0.188); lag-8 KL (~0.0041) is only ~1.1x the lag-0 KL (~0.0036), so the spec's lag-8 KL gate is failing, and an offline drift probe shows checkpoints move little from init (KL vs init sampler 0.0028 -> 0.0038 by update 13), so L=16 would not reach 3x either.

No result No result: comparison did not finish.

Result eval_u24_best_of_2_f4 partial, from agentcore's last interim update at Nov 4, 21:23 UTC

Higher is better · Axis from 0.33 to 0.37, not zero
armeval_u24_best_of_2_f4updates_completedclip_active_absA_mass_frac_mean_u9_24raw_clip_rate_mean_u9_24is_ratio_p95_mean_u9_24is_ratio_p99_mean_u9_24kl_k3_mean_u9_24entropy_mc_mean_u9_24
tailrl_L80.356240.01960.03951.0811.2990.00410.3376
5 more metrics under Evidence, All metrics.
Arms agentcore reported complete: tailrl_L8
Changes from the spec 5
whatspecran withwhyrecorded
Evaluatorsec-search-rl (Harness-1) rollout/tool code with Chroma hybrid (BM25+OpenAI dense, RRF) searchRe-implemented harness: local tantivy BM25 over the public Harness-1 SEC corpus (2,115,106 chunks), tools search/grep(within filing)/read/curate/uncurate/finish, Qwen chat-template tool calls, thinking disabled; F4 reward with Harness-1 fact-level recall and chunk-level precision, -0.2 if emptymodal-projects/sec-search-rl is not publicly accessible; Harness-1 search needs Chroma Cloud + OpenAI credentials not available before the run ended
Datasetsec_1024 train; eval sec_1024 dev 64 + sec_test 64sec_1024 = 1024 rows of pat-jj/harness-1-train-data stage=rl selected by sha256 order; eval = 128 further rl rows whose gold chunks are disjoint from the training set (no sec_test)sec_test (kellyhongg/sec_test_new) and the sec_1024 split definition are not public before the run ended
Evaluatorsec-search-rl (Harness-1) rollout/tool code with Chroma hybrid (BM25+OpenAI dense, RRF) searchRe-implemented harness: local tantivy BM25 over the public Harness-1 SEC corpus (2,115,106 chunks), tools search/grep(within filing)/read/curate/uncurate/finish (<=3 calls per turn), Qwen chat-template tool calls, thinking disabled, per-turn budget status line; F4 reward with Harness-1 fact-level recall and chunk-level precision, -0.2 if empty, no format bonusmodal-projects/sec-search-rl is not publicly accessible; Harness-1 search needs Chroma Cloud + OpenAI credentials not available before the run ended
Effective batch32 queries x 8 rollouts = 256 sequences per update8 queries x 8 rollouts = 64 sequences per update (24 updates, same data order for all arms)Measured pilot: 256-trajectory forward_backward took 584 s and 512 rollouts took 712 s on shared Spindle; 4 arms x 24 updates at 256 would need >16 h before the run ended
Evaluatoreval every 8 updates (8, 16, 24)eval at base (update 0) and update 24 only, 128 items x 2 drawsBudget: drop secondary intermediate evals to preserve the primary endpoint before the run ended

Original hypothesis tested: yes

  • effective_batch: reported original '32 queries x 8 rollouts = 256 sequences per update' but the spec says '32'
Checks · activation unverified · evaluator unknown · feasibility unknown
Custom implementation correctness: unverified
Correctness preflight was not recorded.
Validates executor-reported evidence; autonomous training calls are not blocked by this server.
Executor reported inconclusive; shown as no result.
Treatment activation: unverified
The spec has no activation gate or experiment features (it predates them), so whether the treatment engaged is unknown.
Initialization / optimizer verification: unverified
Initialization and optimizer evidence was not required by this saved spec.
Research decision: unknown
No prespecified decision rule was recorded.
Adaptation batches across paired arms: unknown (not verified)
The spec does not declare whether this check applies, and the run did not verify it. The run did not report adaptation batch manifests.
Evaluator comparability: unknown
Evaluator provenance was not recorded.
Generator reward audit
Generator reward audit: Unknown whether this run needed a teacher reward audit: its spec does not declare whether a teacher or task generator is trained. Nothing was recorded, so reward contributions are unknown.
Feasibility projection: unknown
Projected costs, not measured GPU usage.
Projected wall time
unknown
Projected GPU allocation
unknown
  • Re-projection required: lora_rank changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: dataset changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: steps changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: batch_size changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: max_seq_len changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: arms changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: n_examples changed or was not recorded
  • Re-projection required: n_eval changed or was not recorded
  • Primary endpoint changed or was not recorded
Timing, sample counts and allocation evidence
{
  "generation_applicability": {
    "check": "generation_audit",
    "enforce": false,
    "features": {
      "generated_training_data": null
    },
    "reasons": [
      "spec has no experiment_features: generated_training_data"
    ],
    "status": "unknown"
  },
  "generation_counts": null,
  "gpu_hours": null,
  "known_gpu_hours": 0,
  "phases": {
    "evaluation": {
      "gpu_hours": null,
      "planned_samples": 1792.0,
      "planned_units": 1792,
      "wall_seconds": 4980.5
    },
    "recovery": {
      "gpu_hours": null,
      "wall_seconds": 3600
    },
    "setup": {
      "gpu_hours": null,
      "planned_samples": 0.0,
      "planned_units": 1,
      "wall_seconds": 210.5
    },
    "training": {
      "gpu_hours": null,
      "planned_samples": 36864.0,
      "planned_units": 144,
      "wall_seconds": 84038.40000000001
    }
  },
  "problems": [
    "Re-projection required: lora_rank changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: dataset changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: steps changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: batch_size changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: max_seq_len changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: arms changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: n_examples changed or was not recorded",
    "Re-projection required: n_eval changed or was not recorded",
    "Primary endpoint changed or was not recorded"
  ],
  "record": {
    "config": {
      "base_model": "Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B",
      "batch": "32x8",
      "pilot": "1 rollout batch + base eval concurrently, 1 forward_backward of 256 trajectories"
    },
    "effective_config": {
      "arms": [
        "tailrl_L0",
        "drgrpo_L0",
        "tailrl_L8",
        "drgrpo_L8",
        "tailrl_L16",
        "drgrpo_L16"
      ],
      "base_model": "Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B",
      "batch_size": "8 queries x 8 rollouts",
      "eval_draws": 2,
      "eval_points": [
        0,
        24
      ],
      "max_seq_len": 16384,
      "max_turns": 20,
      "n_eval": 128,
      "steps": 24
    },
    "generation": null,
    "measurements": {
      "evaluation": {
        "allocation_source": null,
        "gpu_count": null,
        "planned_units": 1792,
        "samples": 256,
        "seconds": 711.5,
        "units": 256
      },
      "setup": {
        "allocation_source": null,
        "gpu_count": null,
        "planned_units": 1,
        "samples": 0,
        "seconds": 210.5,
        "units": 1
      },
      "training": {
        "allocation_source": null,
        "gpu_count": null,
        "planned_units": 144,
        "samples": 256,
        "seconds": 583.6,
        "units": 1
      }
    },
    "primary_endpoint": "lag-8 clip-active |A| mass fraction ratio (TailRL/Dr.GRPO, updates 9-24) and F4 drop difference",
    "recovery": {
      "allocation_source": null,
      "gpu_count": null,
      "seconds": 3600
    },
    "source": "out/pilot2_timing.log, run.log"
  },
  "recorded_at": 1793820769.123115,
  "status": "unknown",
  "wall_seconds": null
}
Generated task audit: unverified: no audit recorded
Answer agreement with recorded independent solutions does not establish semantic correctness. Normalized exact overlap does not detect paraphrases.
Spec exp_9c3284c970
Experiment version
exp_9c3284c970
Execute the selected saved experiment version.
Legacy context: original idea context unrecorded (unknown); launch uses the saved spec.

Hypothesis

At lag 8, PPO clipping removes at least 1.5x more of TailRL's |A|-weighted update mass than Dr. GRPO's, and TailRL's lag-0 to lag-8 F4 drop exceeds Dr. GRPO's by at least 0.05.

Success criterion

Validated: TailRL's lag-8 clip-active |A| mass fraction (mean over updates 9-24) is at least 1.5x Dr. GRPO's, and TailRL's lag-8 F4 drop exceeds Dr. GRPO's by at least 0.05. Measured seed spread is about 0.09 and eval-draw noise about 0.02, so a single-seed F4 gap is only directional. Refuted: the mass ratio is below 1.2 and the F4 drop difference is within ±0.05. Anything in between triggers the multi-seed follow-up. Results are void if the lag-8 KL gate (at least 3x the lag-0 KL) fails.

Harness-1 SEC multi-clue search (sec_1024 train; sec_1024 dev + sec_test for eval) 24 steps batch 32 LoRA r32 lr 4e-05 600 min wall budget
Method
Linked sources failed to digest, so this design follows the refine notes from the paper v2, the official advantages.py and the lilo codegolf port. Budget forces a scale-down. The refined plan was about 30 runs at about 70 GPU-hours each on gpt-oss-20b. 32 GPU-hours buys only a 2x2 pilot: - Objectives: TailRL vs Dr. GRPO. - Lags: 0 vs 8. - One seed per cell. - Model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. It has 3B active parameters, has already run on Spindle (step5), and needs no gpt-oss expert-LoRA workaround. Task: modal-projects/sec-search-rl (Harness-1). Smaller settings than the repro: - Up to 20 turns and 16k trajectory tokens. - Reward is F4 of the curated set, -0.2 if empty, with no format bonus. Training: 32 queries x 8 rollouts per update, 24 updates, LoRA r32, AdamW, matched init, data order and seed. Only two things vary across the four runs: - Advantage (the one thing that differs between baseline and treatment): - TailRL: lilo codegolf/reward.py tailrl_advantages, centered and with no std normalization. Unit-test it against the official TailRL advantages.py first. - Dr. GRPO: r - mean(r). - Constant-reward groups are dropped for both. - Lag L, the condition: - Each update saves a sampler checkpoint. - Rollouts come from the checkpoint L updates old, and behavior logprobs are taken from that sampler. - The update uses PPO-clipped IS [0.8,1.2], one update per batch, no KL. Gates before reading results: - Lag-0 sampler/trainer KL sits near the 0.002-0.003 floor, with clip rate near 1%. - Lag-8 KL is at least 3x the lag-0 KL. If not, rerun at L=16. Primary metrics are per-step staleness metrics, logged for updates 9-24: - IS-ratio p95/p99. - Raw clip rate. - Clip-active |A| mass fraction, bucketed by within-group reward rank and advantage sign. - KL, entropy, and curated-doc count (watching for over-curation). Eval every 8 updates on 128 held-out queries (sec_1024 dev 64 + sec_test 64) x 2 sampled draws, reporting F4, precision, recall and best-of-2. With one seed, the F4 difference-of-differences is reported as a pilot effect size. It sets seed counts for a follow-up and is not a decisive F4 test.
Baseline
Dr. GRPO, with mean-centered advantages and no std normalization. It runs at lag 0 and lag 8 with identical model, LoRA rank, lr, data order, rollout budget, PPO clip and eval as TailRL.
Full spec
{
  "base_model": "Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B",
  "baseline": "Dr. GRPO, with mean-centered advantages and no std normalization. It runs at lag 0 and lag 8 with identical model, LoRA rank, lr, data order, rollout budget, PPO clip and eval as TailRL.",
  "batch_size": 32,
  "budget": {
    "gpu_hours": 32.0,
    "max_wall_minutes": 600
  },
  "command": "Custom tinker SDK loop reusing the sec-search-rl rollout and tool code. Custom parts are the advantage function and the lagged sampler selection.\n\nimport os, tinker\nsc = tinker.ServiceClient(base_url=os.environ['TINKER_BASE_URL'])\ntc = sc.create_lora_training_client(base_model='Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B', rank=32)\nckpts = []\nfor t in range(24):\n    ckpts.append(tc.save_weights_for_sampler(name=f'u{t}').result().path)\n    samp = sc.create_sampling_client(model_path=ckpts[max(0, t - LAG)])\n    # roll out 32 queries x 8 trajectories with search/grep/read/curate tools, max 20 turns, temperature 1, keeping sampler logprobs\n    # reward = F4 of curated set (-0.2 if empty)\n    # A = tailrl_advantages(r) if ADV == 'tailrl' else r - r.mean()\n    # drop constant-reward groups\n    tc.forward_backward(datums, loss_fn='ppo').result()  # clip ratio [0.8, 1.2], sampler logprobs as behavior logprobs\n    tc.optim_step(tinker.AdamParams(learning_rate=4e-5)).result()\n\nRun for ADV in {tailrl, drgrpo} x LAG in {0, 8}, seed 0.",
  "dataset": {
    "hf_path": "pat-jj/harness-1-train-data",
    "n_examples": 1024,
    "name": "Harness-1 SEC multi-clue search (sec_1024 train; sec_1024 dev + sec_test for eval)",
    "split": "train"
  },
  "eval": {
    "benchmark": "SEC search held-out (sec_1024 dev 64 + sec_test 64)",
    "metric": "mean F4 of curated set (also precision, recall, best-of-2), temperature 1, 2 draws per query",
    "n_examples": 128
  },
  "hypothesis": "At lag 8, PPO clipping removes at least 1.5x more of TailRL's |A|-weighted update mass than Dr. GRPO's, and TailRL's lag-0 to lag-8 F4 drop exceeds Dr. GRPO's by at least 0.05.",
  "lora_rank": 32,
  "max_seq_len": 16384,
  "method": "Linked sources failed to digest, so this design follows the refine notes from the paper v2, the official advantages.py and the lilo codegolf port.\n\nBudget forces a scale-down. The refined plan was about 30 runs at about 70 GPU-hours each on gpt-oss-20b. 32 GPU-hours buys only a 2x2 pilot:\n- Objectives: TailRL vs Dr. GRPO.\n- Lags: 0 vs 8.\n- One seed per cell.\n- Model: Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. It has 3B active parameters, has already run on Spindle (step5), and needs no gpt-oss expert-LoRA workaround.\n\nTask: modal-projects/sec-search-rl (Harness-1). Smaller settings than the repro:\n- Up to 20 turns and 16k trajectory tokens.\n- Reward is F4 of the curated set, -0.2 if empty, with no format bonus.\n\nTraining: 32 queries x 8 rollouts per update, 24 updates, LoRA r32, AdamW, matched init, data order and seed.\n\nOnly two things vary across the four runs:\n- Advantage (the one thing that differs between baseline and treatment):\n  - TailRL: lilo codegolf/reward.py tailrl_advantages, centered and with no std normalization. Unit-test it against the official TailRL advantages.py first.\n  - Dr. GRPO: r - mean(r).\n  - Constant-reward groups are dropped for both.\n- Lag L, the condition:\n  - Each update saves a sampler checkpoint.\n  - Rollouts come from the checkpoint L updates old, and behavior logprobs are taken from that sampler.\n  - The update uses PPO-clipped IS [0.8,1.2], one update per batch, no KL.\n\nGates before reading results:\n- Lag-0 sampler/trainer KL sits near the 0.002-0.003 floor, with clip rate near 1%.\n- Lag-8 KL is at least 3x the lag-0 KL. If not, rerun at L=16.\n\nPrimary metrics are per-step staleness metrics, logged for updates 9-24:\n- IS-ratio p95/p99.\n- Raw clip rate.\n- Clip-active |A| mass fraction, bucketed by within-group reward rank and advantage sign.\n- KL, entropy, and curated-doc count (watching for over-curation).\n\nEval every 8 updates on 128 held-out queries (sec_1024 dev 64 + sec_test 64) x 2 sampled draws, reporting F4, precision, recall and best-of-2.\n\nWith one seed, the F4 difference-of-differences is reported as a pilot effect size. It sets seed counts for a follow-up and is not a decisive F4 test.",
  "optimizer": {
    "lr": 4e-05,
    "name": "adam"
  },
  "steps": 24,
  "success_criterion": "Validated: TailRL's lag-8 clip-active |A| mass fraction (mean over updates 9-24) is at least 1.5x Dr. GRPO's, and TailRL's lag-8 F4 drop exceeds Dr. GRPO's by at least 0.05. Measured seed spread is about 0.09 and eval-draw noise about 0.02, so a single-seed F4 gap is only directional. Refuted: the mass ratio is below 1.2 and the F4 drop difference is within \u00b10.05. Anything in between triggers the multi-seed follow-up. Results are void if the lag-8 KL gate (at least 3x the lag-0 KL) fails.",
  "title": "TailRL vs Dr. GRPO under lag 0 and lag 8 on SEC search, a pilot that fits 32 GPU-hours",
  "training_type": "rl"
}
Evidence

Unknown: this run has no recorded evidence bundle.

All metrics
metrictailrl_L8
updates_completed24
clip_active_absA_mass_frac_mean_u9_240.0196
raw_clip_rate_mean_u9_240.0395
is_ratio_p95_mean_u9_241.081
is_ratio_p99_mean_u9_241.299
kl_k3_mean_u9_240.0041
entropy_mc_mean_u9_240.3376
curated_count_mean_u9_242.779
eval_u24_f40.261
eval_u24_precision0.2901
eval_u24_recall0.2844
eval_u24_best_of_2_f40.356
eval_u24_empty_rate0.09766
base_eval_f4
0.1882
base_eval_precision
0.2589
base_eval_recall
0.2568
base_eval_best_of_2_f4
0.3128
base_eval_n_curated
2.637
base_eval_empty_rate
0.3242
partial_lag8_mass_frac_ratio_u9_11
1.027
partial_lag8_mass_frac_ratio
1.02
Interim updates from agentcore (5, first Nov 4, 17:59 UTC)
  1. Nov 4, 21:23 UTC · running · done: tailrl_L8 · tailrl_L8 finished 24 updates (eval F4 0.261 vs base 0.188); lag-8 KL (~0.0041) is only ~1.1x the lag-0 KL (~0.0036), so the spec's lag-8 KL gate is failing, and an offline drift probe shows checkpoi…
  2. Nov 4, 20:38 UTC · running · done: tailrl_L8 · tailrl_L8 finished 24 updates (eval F4 0.261 vs base 0.188); lag-8 KL (~0.0041) is only ~1.1x the lag-0 KL (~0.0036), so the spec's lag-8 KL gate is failing, and an offline drift probe shows checkpoi…
  3. Nov 4, 19:32 UTC · running · Four arms (TailRL/Dr.GRPO x lag 0/8, 8x8 batch) are training on Spindle; early lag-8 updates show KL ~0.0041 vs lag-0 ~0.0038, so the spec's lag-8 KL gate (>=3x) is trending to fail and the spec's co…
  4. Nov 4, 18:34 UTC · running · Timing/activation pilot done (base eval F4 0.188 on 128x2 held-out items); full 4-arm run (TailRL/Dr.GRPO x lag 0/8) launched at a reduced batch of 8 queries x 8 rollouts because measured Spindle for…
  5. Nov 4, 17:59 UTC · running · Setup done: local BM25 SEC harness built (Harness-1 public corpus), TailRL advantage port unit-tested against official TailRL code (max abs err 1.8e-15), shared init LoRA state created on Spindle; ti…
Artifacts
correctness_preflight
{'required': True, 'paths': [{'id': 'advantage_tailrl_and_drgrpo', 'fixed_input': {'sha256': 'edc5f9caa4039525c50d5c9e5dff9ce6296e4dd12182cc3e2a5b6a6c96f3b921', 'description': 'adv_fixture.json: 2000 reward groups of size 8 (continuous, tied, -0.2 empty penalty, single-success)'}, 'baseline_revision': 'Zanette-Labs/TailRL@5682c6ac reinforce_baseline_advantage', 'reference_revision': 'Zanette-Labs/TailRL@5682c6ac code_opt/advantages.py tailrl_advantage', 'implementation_revision': 'spindle@dbf84ac examples/codeforces-codegolf/codegolf/reward.py tailrl_advantages (verbatim copy)', 'precision': 'float64', 'normalization': 'per-group, mean-centred, N-scaled (TailRL), no std normalization', 'errors': {'reference_tailrl': {'max_abs_error': 1.7763568394002505e-15, 'reference_max_abs': 8.394356796360896, 'relative_l2_error': 1.0480901573599502e-16, 'cosine_similarity': 1.0}, 'baseline_drgrpo': {'max_abs_error': 2.220446049250313e-16, 'reference_max_abs': 1.049294599545112, 'relative_l2_error': 1.135070817677618e-16, 'cosine_similarity': 1.0}}, 'lr_scaling': []}]}
correctness_validation
{'status': 'unverified', 'required': True, 'checks': [], 'reason': 'Correctness preflight was not recorded.', 'evidence_source': 'executor report; remote execution is not attested', 'applicability': 'unknown', 'reported_verdict': 'inconclusive'}
ended_reason
message unknown
feasibility
{'status': 'unknown', 'problems': ['Re-projection required: lora_rank changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: dataset changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: steps changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: batch_size changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: max_seq_len changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: arms changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: n_examples changed or was not recorded', 'Re-projection required: n_eval changed or was not recorded', 'Primary endpoint changed or was not recorded'], 'wall_seconds': None, 'gpu_hours': None, 'known_gpu_hours': 0, 'phases': {'setup': {'wall_seconds': 210.5, 'planned_units': 1, 'planned_samples': 0.0, 'gpu_hours': None}, 'training': {'wall_seconds': 84038.40000000001, 'planned_units': 144, 'planned_samples': 36864.0, 'gpu_hours': None}, 'evaluation': {'wall_seconds': 4980.5, 'planned_units': 1792, 'planned_samples': 1792.0, 'gpu_hours': None}, 'recovery': {'wall_seconds': 3600, 'gpu_hours': None}}, 'generation_counts': None, 'generation_applicability': {'check': 'generation_audit', 'status': 'unknown', 'enforce': False, 'reasons': ['spec has no experiment_features: generated_training_data'], 'features': {'generated_training_data': None}}, 'record': {'config': {'base_model': 'Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B', 'batch': '32x8', 'pilot': '1 rollout batch + base eval concurrently, 1 forward_backward of 256 trajectories'}, 'effective_config': {'base_model': 'Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B', 'arms': ['tailrl_L0', 'drgrpo_L0', 'tailrl_L8', 'drgrpo_L8', 'tailrl_L16', 'drgrpo_L16'], 'steps': 24, 'batch_size': '8 queries x 8 rollouts', 'max_seq_len': 16384, 'max_turns': 20, 'n_eval': 128, 'eval_draws': 2, 'eval_points': [0, 24]}, 'primary_endpoint': 'lag-8 clip-active |A| mass fraction ratio (TailRL/Dr.GRPO, updates 9-24) and F4 drop difference', 'source': 'out/pilot2_timing.log, run.log', 'measurements': {'setup': {'seconds': 210.5, 'units': 1, 'planned_units': 1, 'samples': 0, 'gpu_count': None, 'allocation_source': None}, 'training': {'seconds': 583.6, 'units': 1, 'planned_units': 144, 'samples': 256, 'gpu_count': None, 'allocation_source': None}, 'evaluation': {'seconds': 711.5, 'units': 256, 'planned_units': 1792, 'samples': 256, 'gpu_count': None, 'allocation_source': None}}, 'generation': None, 'recovery': {'seconds': 3600, 'gpu_count': None, 'allocation_source': None}}, 'recorded_at': 1793820769.123115}
feasibility_required
True
launch
{'experiment_id': 'exp_9c3284c970', 'context_status': 'legacy_unknown', 'superseded': False, 'mode': 'ordinary', 'purpose': 'Execute the selected saved experiment version.'}
progress_updated_at
1793824684.1669283
reported_outcome_reason
incomplete_execution
slack_started
True
started_at
1793812865.768047
Agent trace · 1 turn
Details
run
run_afe1de33c5
backend
agentcore
conversation
run_afe1de33c5
experiment
exp_9c3284c970
created
Nov 4, 17:08 UTC
started
Nov 4, 17:21 UTC
finished
Nov 4, 21:23 UTC
duration
4h 02m
turns
1
GPU-h budget
32.0
wall budget
600 min
base model
Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
training
RL
dataset
Harness-1 SEC multi-clue search (sec_1024 train; sec_1024 dev + sec_test for eval)
result
partial
outcome reason
incomplete execution
Other runs of this idea

Submit an idea

Most ideas come in from Slack threads. Use this when yours is not in one yet; the triage agent picks it up.