TriMuon vs dimuon-lite (Polar Express) for LoRA SFT on no_robots
Ran all 6 rank-32 LoRA SFT runs (Qwen3.5-4B, no_robots, 80 steps, LR 5e-5/1e-4/2e-4) for dimuon-lite and TriMuon on a throwaway Spindle fork spindle-fork-run_7703c518e0. At the best LR (2e-4 for both arms) TriMuon's held-out NLL was 0.0031 nats worse (2.16729 vs 2.16422) and its median optimizer step was about 2.3x slower (0.0696 s vs 0.0307 s), so the claim fails.
Result
No arm results yet.
- pe_eval_nll_lr5e-5
- 2.367
- pe_eval_nll_lr1e-4
- 2.322
- pe_eval_nll_lr2e-4
- 2.164
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr5e-5
- 2.367
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr1e-4
- 2.324
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr2e-4
- 2.167
- best_lr_pe
- 0.0002
- best_lr_trimuon
- 0.0002
- best_lr_eval_nll_gap_trimuon_minus_pe
- 0.00307
- pe_best_median_optimizer_step_s
- 0.03068
- trimuon_best_median_optimizer_step_s
- 0.06958
- runs_completed
- 6
- eval_examples
- 500
- steps
- 80
Changes from the spec 0
Checks · activation unverified · evaluator unknown · feasibility unknown
Spec exp_ff293ca443
Hypothesis
With a Spindle fork that adds TriMuon, LoRA SFT on Qwen3.5-4B reaches held-out no_robots loss at least 0.01 nats lower than dimuon-lite (Polar Express) at its best LR, after the same 80 steps.
Success criterion
Validated if best-LR TriMuon eval NLL is at least 0.01 nats below best-LR dimuon-lite eval NLL, and TriMuon's median optimizer step time is not higher. Failed if the gap is under 0.01 nats or reversed. A rerun of the best PE config with a second seed is optional, if budget allows, to check that the 0.01 margin exceeds seed noise.
Method
Baseline
Full spec
{
"base_model": "Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B",
"baseline": "dimuon-lite (DiMuon with Polar Express), beta1=0.9, grad_clip_norm=0.0. Same model, rank, data order, seed, renderer, batch size, steps and LR grid. The best-LR run of each arm is compared.",
"batch_size": 64,
"budget": {
"gpu_hours": 1.8,
"max_wall_minutes": 120
},
"command": "python - <<'EOF'\n# Custom part: the TriMuon config exists only on the fork; the baseline uses tinker.types.DimuonOptimizerConfig() / DimuonParams.\nimport os, tinker\nfrom tinker_cookbook.recipes.chat_sl import chat_datasets # renderer + no_robots builder\nsc = tinker.ServiceClient(base_url=os.environ[\"TINKER_BASE_URL\"]) # fork URL for the TriMuon arm\nARM = os.environ.get(\"ARM\", \"pe\"); LR = float(os.environ.get(\"LR\", \"1e-4\"))\nopt_cfg = tinker.types.DimuonOptimizerConfig() if ARM == \"pe\" else tinker.types.TrimuonOptimizerConfig() # Trimuon* added by the fork\ntc = sc.create_lora_training_client(base_model=\"Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B\", rank=32, optimizer=opt_cfg)\ntrain, test = chat_datasets.no_robots_batches(tc.get_tokenizer(), batch_size=64, max_length=2048, seed=0)\nfor step, batch in zip(range(80), train):\n tc.forward_backward(batch, loss_fn=\"cross_entropy\").result()\n P = tinker.types.DimuonParams if ARM == \"pe\" else tinker.types.TrimuonParams\n tc.optim_step(P(learning_rate=LR, beta1=0.9, grad_clip_norm=0.0)).result()\nprint(\"eval_nll\", sum(tc.forward(b, loss_fn=\"cross_entropy\").result().metrics[\"loss:mean\"] for b in test) / len(test))\ntc.save_weights_for_sampler(name=f\"rx-trimuon-{ARM}-{LR}\")\nEOF",
"dataset": {
"hf_path": "HuggingFaceH4/no_robots",
"n_examples": 5120,
"name": "no_robots",
"split": "train (eval on test)"
},
"eval": {
"benchmark": "no_robots test split",
"metric": "mean per-token NLL on assistant tokens",
"n_examples": 500
},
"hypothesis": "With a Spindle fork that adds TriMuon, LoRA SFT on Qwen3.5-4B reaches held-out no_robots loss at least 0.01 nats lower than dimuon-lite (Polar Express) at its best LR, after the same 80 steps.",
"lora_rank": 32,
"max_seq_len": 2048,
"method": "Fork modal-projects/spindle and add TriMuon as an optimizer option. It keeps DiMuon's recovered momentum and preconditioning rules. It replaces only the Polar Express polar step with two outer Polar Switch passes, then four cubic Newton-Schulz refinements folded into the rank x rank multiplier. Use the FP16 polar core and TF32 disabled, as in aaron's benchmark. Deploy the fork as a throwaway copy. Train rank-32 LoRA on Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B with a short tinker SDK SFT loop on no_robots. The loop uses the cookbook renderer for the model, forward_backward with cross_entropy, then optim_step. The treatment arm runs on the fork with TriMuon. The baseline arm runs dimuon-lite on the same fork (or shared Spindle) with identical code. Each arm sweeps LR over {5e-5, 1e-4, 2e-4}: 6 runs of 80 steps each, same data order and seed. Each run evaluates held-out loss at step 80 and logs per-step optimizer wall time. Qwen3.5-4B is a scaled-down stand-in for the source's Qwen3-8B rank-32 workload. Polar Switch and AdamW arms are follow-up specs, not part of this decision.",
"optimizer": {
"lr": 0.0001,
"name": "trimuon (fork)"
},
"steps": 80,
"success_criterion": "Validated if best-LR TriMuon eval NLL is at least 0.01 nats below best-LR dimuon-lite eval NLL, and TriMuon's median optimizer step time is not higher. Failed if the gap is under 0.01 nats or reversed. A rerun of the best PE config with a second seed is optional, if budget allows, to check that the 0.01 margin exceeds seed noise.",
"title": "TriMuon vs dimuon-lite (Polar Express) for LoRA SFT on no_robots",
"training_type": "sft"
}Evidence
All metrics
- pe_eval_nll_lr5e-5
- 2.367
- pe_eval_nll_lr1e-4
- 2.322
- pe_eval_nll_lr2e-4
- 2.164
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr5e-5
- 2.367
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr1e-4
- 2.324
- trimuon_eval_nll_lr2e-4
- 2.167
- best_lr_pe
- 0.0002
- best_lr_trimuon
- 0.0002
- best_lr_eval_nll_gap_trimuon_minus_pe
- 0.00307
- pe_best_median_optimizer_step_s
- 0.03068
- trimuon_best_median_optimizer_step_s
- 0.06958
- runs_completed
- 6
- eval_examples
- 500
- steps
- 80
Agent trace full trace with commands in Devin ↗
Details
- run
- run_7703c518e0
- backend
- Devin
- session
- devin-44b6f360c5c94b28afc43faeda056d22
- experiment
- exp_ff293ca443
- redone as
- run_bb9eb83573 no result
- created
- Nov 3, 05:20 UTC
- started
- Nov 3, 05:20 UTC
- finished
- Nov 3, 06:28 UTC
- duration
- 1h 07m
- GPU-h budget
- 1.8
- wall budget
- 120 min
- base model
- Qwen/Qwen3.5-4B
- training
- SFT
- dataset
- no_robots
- run_bd61cdb704 no result 1h ago
- run_9a86933e38 not supported 5h ago
- run_bb9eb83573 no result 5h ago